Science od Frankenstein

When I read about “Frankenstein” I only had one word came up in my mine. It was immoral. Why did I think it is immoral? I thought that human nature was always from life to dead, never turned dead to life beside God. That couldn’t be happened in real life and it would destroy the rule of human. Otherwise, he created a new life which meant it was possible to create a new life or a replication of human. In science, it had the method to make a DNA replication. The process was “replication” in that each strand of the original double-stranded DNA molecules serves as template for the reproduction of the complementary strand. This suggest anything that you think it is impossible is can be happened in science.

http://www.dnareplication.info/

In the other hand, I felt pain about the monster because he was crated and abandoned by Frankenstein. The monster just wanted love from Frankenstein and treated him like a normal people. Frankenstein never teaches him how to speak, how to write, what should do, what shouldn’t do. Frankenstein just wanted to kill him because he thought the creature had risk to people. Otherwise, Frankenstein didn’t know the creature was innocent as same as a child and the creature helped other people. Frankenstein shouldn’t treat him like this. He had responsibility to resolve what he had done.


Shuk Ha Chung